2
0
mirror of https://github.com/xcat2/xcat-core.git synced 2026-09-21 16:39:30 +00:00
Files
xcat-core/xCAT-test/unit
Daniel Hilst 69be7872f2 test(xcat-core): capture the DNS update retry sending two TSIG records
send_ddns_update signs the same packet on every attempt. Net::DNS appends the
TSIG to the additional section, so the second attempt carries two TSIG records.
named answers FORMERR to that message, which is neither NOTAUTH nor SERVFAIL, so
the routine stops and reports FORMERR. The retry path can never be accepted.

ddns_update_retry.t drives send_ddns_update with a resolver that answers FORMERR
to a message with more than one TSIG record, as named does, and otherwise
answers a scripted rcode. It asserts that every attempt carries exactly one TSIG
record and the same update records, and that a retry answered NOERROR reports
success. Both subtests fail before the fix.

The header of each new test records that XCATROOT must name the tree under test,
because xCAT::Table adds the installed /opt/xcat/lib/perl to @INC.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Hilst <392820+dhilst@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-09-15 20:43:58 -03:00
..

xCAT-test/unit

Unit tests. These run against the source tree only -- no xCAT installation, no running daemons, no management node.

They are executed on every pull request by the xcat_test GitHub Actions workflow, which calls run_unit_tests() in github_action_xcat_test.pl:

prove -r xCAT-test/unit

You can run exactly the same thing from a clean checkout:

cd <xcat-core checkout>
prove -r xCAT-test/unit

What belongs here

A test belongs in unit/ when everything it needs is in the checkout: plugin and library sources, kickstart/preseed/subiquity templates, postscripts, packaging metadata. Such a test asserts on rendered output or module logic and reaches the repository root through FindBin:

use FindBin;
use lib "$FindBin::Bin/../../perl-xCAT";
use lib "$FindBin::Bin/../../xCAT-server/lib/perl";

Because of those FindBin paths the tests only work from a source tree. The copy installed under /opt/xcat/share/xcat/tools/autotest/unit is not a substitute -- ../.. resolves to /opt/xcat/share/xcat/tools there and the tests die or silently skip. The CI takes a copy of the checkout before the build for this reason; see preserve_source_tree().

What does not belong here

Anything that needs an installed xCAT, a populated /install, a real service binary or a live daemon. Those go in ../integration and run on a management node through xcattest. Both suites run on every pull request -- the workflow installs xCAT on the runner and then runs the ci_test cases against it -- so putting a test in integration/ does not cost it CI coverage. What differs is what each suite is allowed to depend on, and that unit tests also run standalone from a bare checkout with no xCAT at all.

Shell-script unit tests belong in ../bats and run with BATS. Do not add Perl .t tests that grep shell source when the behavior can be exercised by sourcing a shell library or script and shadowing the external commands it calls.

The distinction matters because a test that needs an absent environment does not fail -- it calls plan skip_all and reports as skipped. A handful of those in a suite of several hundred assertions is easy to stop reading. Keeping the two kinds in separate directories means a skip in unit/ is a real signal rather than routine noise.

Guarding on a source file, on the other hand, is fine and common here:

plan skip_all => "compute.subiquity.tmpl not found" unless -f $tmpl_path;

That guard never fires when the tree is intact.