2
0
mirror of https://github.com/xcat2/xcat-core.git synced 2026-09-21 16:39:30 +00:00
Files
xcat-core/xCAT-test/unit
Daniel Hilst 97f481a570 fix(build): builddebs.pl drops riscv64, so apt serves no riscv64 xCAT
builddebs.pl replaced build-ubunturepo as the Ubuntu builder, and the arch support
riscv64 has in build-ubunturepo did not come with it. The pipeline prefers builddebs.pl
whenever the ref carries it, so on this branch the switch silently stops producing riscv64
debs: no xcat_*_riscv64.deb in the pool, and a published Release that says
'Architectures: amd64 ppc64el'. apt on a riscv64 management node then reports 'Unable to
locate package xcat', which is the same failure build-ubunturepo was fixed for.

builddebs.pl reads its architectures from BuildUtils, so unlike build-ubunturepo -- which
hardcoded the pair in three places -- riscv64 goes in one: @DEB_ARCHES.

xcat-genesis-scripts is the exception and needs its own rule. Its per-arch deb Depends on
xcat-genesis-base-<arch>, and no riscv64 genesis-base deb exists, because riscv64 takes the
OpenEmbedded Genesis image from the shared xcat-dep pool. Built for riscv64 it would be
uninstallable, so deb_package_arches excludes it.

build_utils.t covers both: removing riscv64 from @DEB_ARCHES fails four assertions,
including the reprepro Architectures line, and removing the genesis-scripts exclusion fails
its own.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Hilst <392820+dhilst@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit 90f9156411b11b33496a470574f37fcdc2a7330f)
2026-09-04 12:20:34 -03:00
..

xCAT-test/unit

Unit tests. These run against the source tree only -- no xCAT installation, no running daemons, no management node.

They are executed on every pull request by the xcat_test GitHub Actions workflow, which calls run_unit_tests() in github_action_xcat_test.pl:

prove -r xCAT-test/unit

You can run exactly the same thing from a clean checkout:

cd <xcat-core checkout>
prove -r xCAT-test/unit

What belongs here

A test belongs in unit/ when everything it needs is in the checkout: plugin and library sources, kickstart/preseed/subiquity templates, postscripts, packaging metadata. Such a test asserts on rendered output or module logic and reaches the repository root through FindBin:

use FindBin;
use lib "$FindBin::Bin/../../perl-xCAT";
use lib "$FindBin::Bin/../../xCAT-server/lib/perl";

Because of those FindBin paths the tests only work from a source tree. The copy installed under /opt/xcat/share/xcat/tools/autotest/unit is not a substitute -- ../.. resolves to /opt/xcat/share/xcat/tools there and the tests die or silently skip. The CI takes a copy of the checkout before the build for this reason; see preserve_source_tree().

What does not belong here

Anything that needs an installed xCAT, a populated /install, a real service binary or a live daemon. Those go in ../integration and run on a management node through xcattest. Both suites run on every pull request -- the workflow installs xCAT on the runner and then runs the ci_test cases against it -- so putting a test in integration/ does not cost it CI coverage. What differs is what each suite is allowed to depend on, and that unit tests also run standalone from a bare checkout with no xCAT at all.

The distinction matters because a test that needs an absent environment does not fail -- it calls plan skip_all and reports as skipped. A handful of those in a suite of several hundred assertions is easy to stop reading. Keeping the two kinds in separate directories means a skip in unit/ is a real signal rather than routine noise.

Guarding on a source file, on the other hand, is fine and common here:

plan skip_all => "compute.subiquity.tmpl not found" unless -f $tmpl_path;

That guard never fires when the tree is intact.