ddns.pm's DNS-update send has a 3-try retry loop, but it only retried on NOTAUTH and -- on the final attempt -- the `next` fell out of the loop without reporting failure. makedns then printed "Completed updating DNS records." and "DNS setup is completed" even when the update was never accepted. Two problems this causes: - SERVFAIL was never retried. named routinely replies SERVFAIL transiently right after a zone (re)load, before the zone is ready to accept dynamic updates; the update succeeds a second or two later. This reliably breaks real flat-cluster provisioning on el9/el10, where the test case's makedns -n runs right after named reloads the zone with the new compute node. - A persistent NOTAUTH/SERVFAIL (retries exhausted) was silently swallowed and reported as success, so a genuinely failed DNS update looked like it worked. Extract the batch send into send_ddns_update(), which retries NOTAUTH and SERVFAIL (pausing on SERVFAIL), returns 0 only on NOERROR, and otherwise emits the error and returns 1. Both batch-send sites now `return 1 if send_ddns_update(...)`, so a real failure aborts add_or_delete_records instead of falsely reporting success. Signed-off-by: Daniel Hilst <392820+dhilst@users.noreply.github.com>
xCAT
xCAT is a toolkit for deployment and administration of clusters of all sizes.
The xCAT sunset was only a quick eclipse
Dear xCAT Community,
The xCAT sunset has changed course. VersatusHPC has been invited to join the xCAT Consortium, and future development will move toward direct upstream contributions coordinated with the Consortium and its existing member companies.
That matters most for Enterprise Linux 10 (EL10). EL10 support is coming to xCAT, restoring a future operating-system path for sites that still rely on xCAT. This is an important change from the previous sunset guidance, where the lack of an EL10 path was one of the strongest reasons to move away from xCAT.
The xCAT Consortium continues to recommend Confluent as the long-term successor to xCAT, and that remains the Consortium position. Users planning new cluster-management deployments should evaluate Confluent and its xCAT comparison documentation.
At the same time, xCAT is no longer sunsetted. The Consortium and participating companies will continue updating xCAT while there is community and user demand for it.
In summary:
- xCAT development is continuing upstream through the Consortium and participating companies.
- Enterprise Linux 10 support is coming.
- Confluent remains the Consortium-recommended successor and migration path.
- xCAT updates will continue while there is community and user demand.
We want to thank the xCAT Consortium and community for keeping this project moving. The sun went behind the moon for a moment, but xCAT is still here.
For more information on Confluent and how to get started, please visit the Confluent: Project Page, Documentation or Confluent vs xCAT comparison.
With thanks,
The xCAT Consortium
Documentation
xCAT Documentation is hosted on Read The Docs: https://xcat-docs.readthedocs.io
Status
| xCAT Version | Build Status |
|---|---|
| Latest (master branch) | |
| Stable (latest release) |
Looking for older versions?
Open Source License
xCAT is made available under the EPL license: https://opensource.org/licenses/eclipse-1.0.php
Developers
Want to help? Check out the developers guide!