A node whose noderes.xcatmaster is unset gets $instserver = '!myipfn!'. That is a placeholder, not a name: pxe.pm:176 and grub2.pm:129 substitute it with my_ip_facing($node) -- an address -- when they write the boot config. The subiquity path resolves $instserver with getipaddr, which returns undef for the placeholder, so it reports "Could not resolve the install server" and `next`s past the node. Before this branch it produced exactly the numeric nfsroot the change is trying to guarantee. anaconda.pm and sles.pm both guard the same placeholder with `unless ($instserver eq '!myipfn!')`. noderes.5.rst:125 documents an unset xcatmaster as supported. No pipeline can catch it: reg_linux_diskfull_installation_flat chdefs xcatmaster=$$MN and no ci/conf/pipelines/*.conf leaves it unset, so CI always takes the resolvable branch. This drives the decision with an injected resolver, so it also checks the resolver is never ASKED about the placeholder rather than only checking the return value. It fails at the extraction guard until the routine exists, so the behavioural proof is the mutation on top of the fix, not this red alone. Signed-off-by: Daniel Hilst <392820+dhilst@users.noreply.github.com>
xCAT-test/unit
Unit tests. These run against the source tree only -- no xCAT installation, no running daemons, no management node.
They are executed on every pull request by the xcat_test GitHub Actions workflow,
which calls run_unit_tests() in github_action_xcat_test.pl:
prove -r xCAT-test/unit
You can run exactly the same thing from a clean checkout:
cd <xcat-core checkout>
prove -r xCAT-test/unit
What belongs here
A test belongs in unit/ when everything it needs is in the checkout: plugin and
library sources, kickstart/preseed/subiquity templates, postscripts, packaging
metadata. Such a test asserts on rendered output or module logic and reaches the
repository root through FindBin:
use FindBin;
use lib "$FindBin::Bin/../../perl-xCAT";
use lib "$FindBin::Bin/../../xCAT-server/lib/perl";
Because of those FindBin paths the tests only work from a source tree. The copy
installed under /opt/xcat/share/xcat/tools/autotest/unit is not a substitute --
../.. resolves to /opt/xcat/share/xcat/tools there and the tests die or silently
skip. The CI takes a copy of the checkout before the build for this reason; see
preserve_source_tree().
What does not belong here
Anything that needs an installed xCAT, a populated /install, a real service binary
or a live daemon. Those go in ../integration and run on
a management node through xcattest. Both suites run on every pull request -- the
workflow installs xCAT on the runner and then runs the ci_test cases against it --
so putting a test in integration/ does not cost it CI coverage. What differs is what
each suite is allowed to depend on, and that unit tests also run standalone from a
bare checkout with no xCAT at all.
The distinction matters because a test that needs an absent environment does not fail
-- it calls plan skip_all and reports as skipped. A handful of those in a suite of
several hundred assertions is easy to stop reading. Keeping the two kinds in separate
directories means a skip in unit/ is a real signal rather than routine noise.
Guarding on a source file, on the other hand, is fine and common here:
plan skip_all => "compute.subiquity.tmpl not found" unless -f $tmpl_path;
That guard never fires when the tree is intact.