2
0
mirror of https://github.com/xcat2/xcat-core.git synced 2026-09-05 04:27:55 +00:00
Files
xcat-core/xCAT-test/unit
Daniel Hilst 2558e84736 test(debian): nothing catches !myipfn! being treated as a hostname
A node whose noderes.xcatmaster is unset gets $instserver = '!myipfn!'. That is
a placeholder, not a name: pxe.pm:176 and grub2.pm:129 substitute it with
my_ip_facing($node) -- an address -- when they write the boot config. The
subiquity path resolves $instserver with getipaddr, which returns undef for the
placeholder, so it reports "Could not resolve the install server" and `next`s
past the node. Before this branch it produced exactly the numeric nfsroot the
change is trying to guarantee.

anaconda.pm and sles.pm both guard the same placeholder with
`unless ($instserver eq '!myipfn!')`. noderes.5.rst:125 documents an unset
xcatmaster as supported.

No pipeline can catch it: reg_linux_diskfull_installation_flat chdefs
xcatmaster=$$MN and no ci/conf/pipelines/*.conf leaves it unset, so CI always
takes the resolvable branch.

This drives the decision with an injected resolver, so it also checks the
resolver is never ASKED about the placeholder rather than only checking the
return value. It fails at the extraction guard until the routine exists, so the
behavioural proof is the mutation on top of the fix, not this red alone.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Hilst <392820+dhilst@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-09-01 18:47:10 -03:00
..
2026-04-23 02:01:33 -03:00
2026-05-05 23:20:18 -03:00

xCAT-test/unit

Unit tests. These run against the source tree only -- no xCAT installation, no running daemons, no management node.

They are executed on every pull request by the xcat_test GitHub Actions workflow, which calls run_unit_tests() in github_action_xcat_test.pl:

prove -r xCAT-test/unit

You can run exactly the same thing from a clean checkout:

cd <xcat-core checkout>
prove -r xCAT-test/unit

What belongs here

A test belongs in unit/ when everything it needs is in the checkout: plugin and library sources, kickstart/preseed/subiquity templates, postscripts, packaging metadata. Such a test asserts on rendered output or module logic and reaches the repository root through FindBin:

use FindBin;
use lib "$FindBin::Bin/../../perl-xCAT";
use lib "$FindBin::Bin/../../xCAT-server/lib/perl";

Because of those FindBin paths the tests only work from a source tree. The copy installed under /opt/xcat/share/xcat/tools/autotest/unit is not a substitute -- ../.. resolves to /opt/xcat/share/xcat/tools there and the tests die or silently skip. The CI takes a copy of the checkout before the build for this reason; see preserve_source_tree().

What does not belong here

Anything that needs an installed xCAT, a populated /install, a real service binary or a live daemon. Those go in ../integration and run on a management node through xcattest. Both suites run on every pull request -- the workflow installs xCAT on the runner and then runs the ci_test cases against it -- so putting a test in integration/ does not cost it CI coverage. What differs is what each suite is allowed to depend on, and that unit tests also run standalone from a bare checkout with no xCAT at all.

The distinction matters because a test that needs an absent environment does not fail -- it calls plan skip_all and reports as skipped. A handful of those in a suite of several hundred assertions is easy to stop reading. Keeping the two kinds in separate directories means a skip in unit/ is a real signal rather than routine noise.

Guarding on a source file, on the other hand, is fine and common here:

plan skip_all => "compute.subiquity.tmpl not found" unless -f $tmpl_path;

That guard never fires when the tree is intact.