The respawn added for the install monitor is paced by a retry budget, and once that budget is spent the daemon stops trying. That reintroduces the failure the respawn exists to remove: with no monitor alive there is nothing left to reset the counter, so xcatiport stays dead until the whole daemon is restarted, and a port that becomes free a minute later is never picked back up. Pacing the retries is necessary -- an unguarded re-fork spins as fast as fork allows while the port is held, and keeps re-entering do_installm_service's USR2 socket-takeover handshake -- but pacing must not decay into giving up. The property that matters is therefore behavioural, not structural: the monitor comes back on its own, at a bounded rate, no matter how long it has been failing. Assert it by driving xcatd's real pacing code rather than grepping for it -- extract the marked mon-respawn-policy region from the script verbatim, the way build_ubunturepo_lock.t drives build-ubunturepo's real lock, and run it. Over a virtual clock, check that the delay backs off to a ceiling and holds there, that the daemon is still forking monitors three hours into a failure, and that a monitor which stayed up long enough to serve resets the pacing when it later dies. Then do it for real against a genuinely held TCP port: fail several times, release the port, and require that a respawned monitor binds it and stays up without the daemon being restarted. Signed-off-by: Daniel Hilst <392820+dhilst@users.noreply.github.com>
xCAT
xCAT is a toolkit for deployment and administration of clusters of all sizes.
The xCAT sunset was only a quick eclipse
Dear xCAT Community,
The xCAT sunset has changed course. VersatusHPC has been invited to join the xCAT Consortium, and future development will move toward direct upstream contributions coordinated with the Consortium and its existing member companies.
That matters most for Enterprise Linux 10 (EL10). EL10 support is coming to xCAT, restoring a future operating-system path for sites that still rely on xCAT. This is an important change from the previous sunset guidance, where the lack of an EL10 path was one of the strongest reasons to move away from xCAT.
The xCAT Consortium continues to recommend Confluent as the long-term successor to xCAT, and that remains the Consortium position. Users planning new cluster-management deployments should evaluate Confluent and its xCAT comparison documentation.
At the same time, xCAT is no longer sunsetted. The Consortium and participating companies will continue updating xCAT while there is community and user demand for it.
In summary:
- xCAT development is continuing upstream through the Consortium and participating companies.
- Enterprise Linux 10 support is coming.
- Confluent remains the Consortium-recommended successor and migration path.
- xCAT updates will continue while there is community and user demand.
We want to thank the xCAT Consortium and community for keeping this project moving. The sun went behind the moon for a moment, but xCAT is still here.
For more information on Confluent and how to get started, please visit the Confluent: Project Page, Documentation or Confluent vs xCAT comparison.
With thanks,
The xCAT Consortium
Documentation
xCAT Documentation is hosted on Read The Docs: https://xcat-docs.readthedocs.io
Status
| xCAT Version | Build Status |
|---|---|
| Latest (master branch) | |
| Stable (latest release) |
Looking for older versions?
Open Source License
xCAT is made available under the EPL license: https://opensource.org/licenses/eclipse-1.0.php
Developers
Want to help? Check out the developers guide!