20bd5dfb59
The automatic corosync cleanup on Juju >= 2.8 turned out not to work and has been removed from charm-hacluster. The 'update-ring' action is now always needed.
229 lines
9.2 KiB
Python
229 lines
9.2 KiB
Python
#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
|
|
|
# Copyright 2019 Canonical Ltd.
|
|
#
|
|
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
# You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
#
|
|
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
#
|
|
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
# limitations under the License.
|
|
|
|
"""HACluster testing."""
|
|
|
|
import logging
|
|
import os
|
|
|
|
import zaza.openstack.charm_tests.test_utils as test_utils
|
|
import zaza.openstack.configure.hacluster
|
|
import zaza.utilities.juju as juju_utils
|
|
|
|
|
|
class HaclusterBaseTest(test_utils.OpenStackBaseTest):
|
|
"""Base class for hacluster tests."""
|
|
|
|
@classmethod
|
|
def setUpClass(cls):
|
|
"""Run class setup for running hacluster tests."""
|
|
super(HaclusterBaseTest, cls).setUpClass()
|
|
cls.vip = os.environ.get("TEST_VIP00")
|
|
|
|
|
|
class HaclusterTest(HaclusterBaseTest):
|
|
"""hacluster tests."""
|
|
|
|
def test_900_action_cleanup(self):
|
|
"""The services can be cleaned up."""
|
|
zaza.model.run_action_on_leader(
|
|
self.application_name,
|
|
'cleanup',
|
|
raise_on_failure=True)
|
|
|
|
def test_910_pause_and_resume(self):
|
|
"""The services can be paused and resumed."""
|
|
with self.pause_resume([]):
|
|
logging.info("Testing pause resume")
|
|
|
|
def _toggle_maintenance_and_wait(self, expected):
|
|
"""Configure cluster maintenance-mode.
|
|
|
|
:param expected: expected value to set maintenance-mode
|
|
"""
|
|
config = {"maintenance-mode": expected}
|
|
logging.info("Setting config to {}".format(config))
|
|
zaza.model.set_application_config(self.application_name, config)
|
|
if expected == 'true':
|
|
_states = {"hacluster": {
|
|
"workload-status": "maintenance",
|
|
"workload-status-message": "Pacemaker in maintenance mode"}}
|
|
else:
|
|
_states = {"hacluster": {
|
|
"workload-status": "active",
|
|
"workload-status-message": "Unit is ready and clustered"}}
|
|
zaza.model.wait_for_application_states(states=_states)
|
|
logging.debug('OK')
|
|
|
|
def test_920_put_in_maintenance(self):
|
|
"""Put pacemaker in maintenance mode."""
|
|
logging.debug('Setting cluster in maintenance mode')
|
|
|
|
self._toggle_maintenance_and_wait('true')
|
|
self._toggle_maintenance_and_wait('false')
|
|
|
|
|
|
class HaclusterScalebackTest(HaclusterBaseTest):
|
|
"""hacluster scaleback tests.
|
|
|
|
Use for testing older releases where lp:1400481 wasn't fixed yet.
|
|
Superseded by HaclusterScaleBackAndForthTest.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
@classmethod
|
|
def setUpClass(cls):
|
|
"""Run class setup for running hacluster scaleback tests."""
|
|
super(HaclusterScalebackTest, cls).setUpClass()
|
|
test_config = cls.test_config['tests_options']['hacluster']
|
|
cls._principle_app_name = test_config['principle-app-name']
|
|
cls._hacluster_charm_name = test_config['hacluster-charm-name']
|
|
|
|
def test_930_scaleback(self):
|
|
"""Remove a unit and add a new one."""
|
|
principle_units = sorted(zaza.model.get_status().applications[
|
|
self._principle_app_name]['units'].keys())
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(principle_units), 3)
|
|
doomed_principle_unit = principle_units[0]
|
|
other_principle_unit = principle_units[1]
|
|
doomed_hacluster_unit = juju_utils.get_subordinate_units(
|
|
[doomed_principle_unit], charm_name=self._hacluster_charm_name)[0]
|
|
other_hacluster_unit = juju_utils.get_subordinate_units(
|
|
[other_principle_unit], charm_name=self._hacluster_charm_name)[0]
|
|
|
|
logging.info('Pausing unit {}'.format(doomed_hacluster_unit))
|
|
zaza.model.run_action(
|
|
doomed_hacluster_unit,
|
|
'pause',
|
|
raise_on_failure=True)
|
|
logging.info('OK')
|
|
|
|
logging.info('Removing {}'.format(doomed_principle_unit))
|
|
zaza.model.destroy_unit(
|
|
self._principle_app_name,
|
|
doomed_principle_unit,
|
|
wait_disappear=True)
|
|
logging.info('OK')
|
|
|
|
logging.info('Waiting for model to settle')
|
|
zaza.model.block_until_unit_wl_status(other_hacluster_unit, 'blocked')
|
|
zaza.model.block_until_unit_wl_status(other_principle_unit, 'blocked')
|
|
zaza.model.block_until_all_units_idle()
|
|
logging.info('OK')
|
|
|
|
logging.info('Adding an hacluster unit')
|
|
zaza.model.add_unit(self._principle_app_name, wait_appear=True)
|
|
logging.info('OK')
|
|
|
|
logging.info('Waiting for model to settle')
|
|
zaza.model.block_until_unit_wl_status(other_hacluster_unit, 'active')
|
|
# NOTE(lourot): the principle application sometimes remain blocked
|
|
# after scaling back up.
|
|
zaza.model.block_until_all_units_idle()
|
|
logging.debug('OK')
|
|
|
|
|
|
class HaclusterScaleBackAndForthTest(HaclusterBaseTest):
|
|
"""hacluster tests scaling back and forth.
|
|
|
|
Supersedes HaclusterScalebackTest.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
@classmethod
|
|
def setUpClass(cls):
|
|
"""Run class setup for running hacluster tests."""
|
|
super(HaclusterScaleBackAndForthTest, cls).setUpClass()
|
|
test_config = cls.test_config['tests_options']['hacluster']
|
|
cls._principle_app_name = test_config['principle-app-name']
|
|
cls._hacluster_charm_name = test_config['hacluster-charm-name']
|
|
|
|
def test_930_scaleback(self):
|
|
"""Remove two units, recalculate quorum and re-add two units.
|
|
|
|
NOTE(lourot): before lp:1400481 was fixed, the corosync ring wasn't
|
|
recalculated when removing units. So within a cluster of 3 units,
|
|
removing two units and re-adding them led to a situation where corosync
|
|
considers having 3 nodes online out of 5, instead of just 3 out of 3.
|
|
This test covers this scenario.
|
|
"""
|
|
principle_units = sorted(zaza.model.get_status().applications[
|
|
self._principle_app_name]['units'].keys())
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(principle_units), 3)
|
|
doomed_principle_units = principle_units[:2]
|
|
surviving_principle_unit = principle_units[2]
|
|
doomed_hacluster_units = juju_utils.get_subordinate_units(
|
|
doomed_principle_units, charm_name=self._hacluster_charm_name)
|
|
surviving_hacluster_unit = juju_utils.get_subordinate_units(
|
|
[surviving_principle_unit],
|
|
charm_name=self._hacluster_charm_name)[0]
|
|
|
|
for doomed_hacluster_unit in doomed_hacluster_units:
|
|
logging.info('Pausing unit {}'.format(doomed_hacluster_unit))
|
|
zaza.model.run_action(
|
|
doomed_hacluster_unit,
|
|
'pause',
|
|
raise_on_failure=True)
|
|
|
|
for doomed_principle_unit in doomed_principle_units:
|
|
logging.info('Removing {}'.format(doomed_principle_unit))
|
|
zaza.model.destroy_unit(
|
|
self._principle_app_name,
|
|
doomed_principle_unit,
|
|
wait_disappear=True)
|
|
|
|
logging.info('Waiting for model to settle')
|
|
zaza.model.block_until_unit_wl_status(surviving_hacluster_unit,
|
|
'blocked')
|
|
# NOTE(lourot): the principle unit (usually a keystone unit) isn't
|
|
# guaranteed to be blocked, so we don't validate that here.
|
|
zaza.model.block_until_all_units_idle()
|
|
|
|
logging.info('Updating corosync ring')
|
|
hacluster_app_name = zaza.model.get_unit_from_name(
|
|
surviving_hacluster_unit).application
|
|
zaza.model.run_action_on_leader(
|
|
hacluster_app_name,
|
|
'update-ring',
|
|
action_params={'i-really-mean-it': True},
|
|
raise_on_failure=True)
|
|
|
|
for article in ('an', 'another'):
|
|
logging.info('Re-adding {} hacluster unit'.format(article))
|
|
zaza.model.add_unit(self._principle_app_name, wait_appear=True)
|
|
|
|
logging.info('Waiting for model to settle')
|
|
# NOTE(lourot): the principle charm may remain blocked here. This seems
|
|
# to happen often when it is keystone and has a mysql-router as other
|
|
# subordinate charm. The keystone units seems to often remain blocked
|
|
# with 'Database not initialised'. This is not the hacluster charm's
|
|
# fault and this is why we don't validate here that the entire model
|
|
# goes back to active/idle.
|
|
zaza.model.block_until_unit_wl_status(surviving_hacluster_unit,
|
|
'active')
|
|
zaza.model.block_until_all_units_idle()
|
|
|
|
# At this point if the corosync ring has been properly updated, there
|
|
# shouldn't be any trace of the deleted units anymore:
|
|
logging.info('Checking that corosync considers all nodes to be online')
|
|
cmd = 'sudo crm status'
|
|
result = zaza.model.run_on_unit(surviving_hacluster_unit, cmd)
|
|
code = result.get('Code')
|
|
if code != '0':
|
|
raise zaza.model.CommandRunFailed(cmd, result)
|
|
output = result.get('Stdout').strip()
|
|
logging.debug('Output received: {}'.format(output))
|
|
self.assertNotIn('OFFLINE', output,
|
|
"corosync shouldn't list any offline node")
|